NavigationUser login |
Website Promotion Insider: THE ZECCO REVIEWOne common method for promoting blog posts and websites is to look for other blog posts and websites that discuss similar items and then leave a comment with a link back to relevant content. What is interesting about this approach is that people regulate their comments very tightly. Let us examine two approaches that I have encountered when attempting to promote my website through this sort of largely harmless and possibly helpful, comment 'spam'. I promote my Zecco review on The Sun's Financial DiarySo naturally, I want my articles to have high search engine ranking. So what do I do? I search for the keywords that I want other people to get to my site by using, and look for the blogs, because those will allow the posting of comments. Here is a search for 'Zecco Review' on Google. When I wanted to open up a brokerage account, I used this review to help determine I first open a Zecco account, so when it came full circle and I commented on it and left a link to my review, it seemed quite appropriate. Sun (the website operator) was kind enough to reply to my comment and agree with my general opinion that Zecco was a so-so broker at best. I attempt to promote my Zecco review on Debtkid's websiteThe very first result of that Google search leads right to a review of Zecco on Debtkid's site. Naturally, I wanted to promote my website on the Number 1 result for 'Zecco Review'! I believe I posted almost the exact same comment that you can see on the Sun's website, and shortly thereafter, I noticed that I received a few referrals from his site. However within a day the referrals dried up. What happened? I went back to Debtkid's site, and surprise, my comment might as well have never existed! Why would this happen? My comment was deleted because Debtkid, as an affiliate of Zecco, is trying to receive commissions for selling Zecco account signups, and people reading my so-so to possibly negative review is not going to help him do that. In short, Debtkid has a conflict of interest and did not act with integrity by deleting my commentThe Sun also receives compensation for people signing up with Zecco, but because he is an ethical person that acts with integrity, he is not going to attempt to omit and hide the truth in order to line his pockets like Debtkid. I left the following comment on Debtkid's site, I doubt it will ever show up:
And of course, the only comment on this review is blandly positive nearly content-less praise:
Where were those awesome engineers when Zecco decided to take the day off and read the paper while taking a huge dump on Monday, April 14th, 2008?
|
|
Um, not exactly.
This is great. I actually deleted your comment not because of the content, but because it was blatantly obvious you were just trying to leave a link to improve your search ranking. Which you just proved here with this post. I knew I was right, thanks for proving it to me.
it's not like I was trying to hide anything about my intentions.
I try to be relatively honest and forthright in my actions; I apologize for telling the truth and attempting to provide your readers with a more nuanced view. (whilst simultaneously gaining search engine rank - two birds with one stone!)
I won't do it again, promise.
It's very revealing and interesting that you don't attempt to address the issue of your conflict of interest.
And how exactly did your 'review' (being very generous here) of Zecco get to the top of the Google results for 'zecco review'? It's a content-less piece of puffery, I can't imagine anyone would grace it with a back-link considering it's a (your words) blatant advertisement. It seems like 'Zecco Review' is a pretty competitive term, and your 'review' certainly doesn't merit the top spot.